> make a forge
> close the forge
> want to buy github
@dashie MS wants to buy GitHub?
Oh boy.
@rysiek rumors for now, but lol yeah
FLOSS community:
> hey let's put all our eggs in this one GitHub basket
> what could possibly go wrong
> GitHub is so convenient
Microsoft:
@codewiz @dashie comparing a solution you can self-host with a fully centralized solution is, I feel, disingenuous.
Of course we should have *more* implementations (and we do, actually), but these are problems on two different levels.
I'd like to see federated issues/pull requests between git-hosting instances thouhg.
@rysiek @codewiz @dashie I wrote up https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/4517 some time ago. I think it's viable, and quite possibly fun to do.
@lupine @rysiek @dashie Awesome proposal, and it seems feasible too!
Some time ago, an old friend of mine implemented a more radical approach to distributed git hosting: https://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-github/
I'm not saying we should do it this way, but I love how he combined three existing technologies to produce fully-distributed version control.
@rysiek
@codewiz @lupine @dashie
Git over SSB is another thing that exists. Haven't really experienced it firsthand.
https://git.scuttlebot.io/%25n92DiQh7ietE%2BR%2BX%2FI403LQoyf2DtR3WQfCkDKlheQU%3D.sha256
@gcupc
I only cloned stuff using it and tried the web interface. Dunno if and how they solved the actual workflow and protecting master yet? But either way it feels radical to use, probably
more so than it actually is.
@rysiek @codewiz @lupine @dashie