Kit Redgrave ๐Ÿ•ฏ is a user on glitch.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
Kit Redgrave ๐Ÿ•ฏ @KitRedgrave

intentionally limited runs of books with no other dissemination method really hacks me off.

the entire point of books is to spread ideas far and wide imo

ยท Web ยท 14 ยท 28

@KitRedgrave Capitalists didn't so much fail to get the memo as they did stuff it in the shredder on sight. ๐Ÿ™„

if you charge $150 or more for a book that only 99 of exist, that tells me that you intend for your book to be a status symbol of how wealthy and well-read you are and not an actual means of sharing your thoughts and wisdom.

and i can't get behind that

@KitRedgrave I get the idea of a book as an "art object", but I don't like the idea of making the book's contents limited. Provide an eBook!

Same for limited edition physical releases of music. You want to make a run of only 100 cassettes or something, fine. But let me at least buy the music in digital format.

@sanspoint it costs them probably very little and they could even charge for it and i wouldn't mind it

it isn't like we're in the year 1150 and the only way new books get created is by monks literally copying all the text into a new one by hand...

the marginal cost of getting a new book out on the internet is pretty darn near zero, and that's a great thing.

you can still have a limited run of books as art objects but it really annoys me if you have that be the only way one can read your book at all

@chara @KitRedgrave what lost sales if itโ€™s a limited run thatโ€™s sold out with no plans for a 2nd run?

@chara @KitRedgrave what we need is something like Project Gutenberg thatโ€™s more like Pirate Bay for out of print books that donโ€™t have a commercial ebook release.

@chara @KitRedgrave specifically for ones that arenโ€™t officially โ€œpublic domainโ€ because capitalism broke our copyright system. The idea of copyright is supposed to be a trade off between exclusivity and sharing of culture, instead it has become rent seeking.

@KitRedgrave @queerhackerwitch that's not how people with money see "intellectual property" unfortunately

@KitRedgrave WHAT

YOU MEAN FATHER DAMIEN HAS BEEN SCAMMING ME THIS WHOLE TIME

@Elizafox artisanal, hand-written $4,000 books :p

the most tedious scam

@KitRedgrave I knew something was fishy about his ability to copy books by hand in 2 hours

@KitRedgrave if it's worth reading, someone will scan it and put on some forum...

@KitRedgrave

Sadly, most textbook that a self thought programmer like me would like to read are above 250$. I could afford one of them at year but I cannot decide which one to buy, because for such price I want an enormous amount of valuable knowledge back.

Like... I become like Neo or Gandalf after reading them.

None of them looks so promising so I do not buy any of them...

But this is very sad.

@paco @KitRedgrave You can't firbid to pass on or sell a used book in the US. One of the few things the US does correctly... For now.

@paco @KitRedgrave Was the "Always ask an adult for help" an attempt at a joke that failed horribly, or was the condescension genuine?

@paco @KitRedgrave On the one hand, if it's intended for kids, "ask an adult" sounds better. On the other hand, I shared an awful lot of books when I was a kid, and it seems callous, ignorant or mean-spirited to demand that, for example, classrooms cannot have a common copy on the shelf.

@KitRedgrave I believe strongly that any /content/ that isn't actively and easily available for a reasonable price should simply be put in the public domain.

As I've said before. at /this day and age/, 'out of print' should only be something you spit at your enemies.